One Nation, _____ ____, Indivisible

No, this is not about whether or not the words “under God” should be included when saying the Pledge of Allegiance; nor is it about saying the Pledge at all.  It’s that word “indivisible” that bothers me.  Indivisible.  It means that it cannot be divided.  For instance, numbers are indivisible by zero.  You can’t do it, at least not if you understand math.

If you want to understand just how indivisible we are NOT, about all you have to do is turn on the news, pick up a newspaper, or simply listen to the people in the booth next to you when you go out to eat.  We are about the most divided society that mankind has ever known in more ways than most of us are even aware of. The thought process essentially recognizes that there are only two types of people – them and us.  Of course, just who “them” are and just who “us” is changes frequently, depending upon who is talking about whom.

There are, of course, the old standby juxtapositions. The black-white, citizen-immigrant, man-woman, young-old divisions are still around, and are still as lively as ever, though the people who hold these views typically have come up with better ways of disguising their disgust for the “other side.” The Klan long ago tossed their white robes and donned business suits. Men don’t keep women barefoot and pregnant anymore. they don’t have to. Instead, they carefully guard those glass ceilings at the corporate level, and work hard to keep women “in their place” by instituting some very crafty policies in the health insurance debate (think “transvaginal probe). We don’t openly discriminate against people who look and speak “different.” We “embrace diversity” and pass laws that punish the bejesus out of employers who hire “illegals” so that they don’t want to hire anyone who even LOOKS like they might not be here legally. We’re good.

Today we have a whole new slate of issues that make us something other than “indivisible.” Toss into the mix the pro-life vs pro-choice argument, the alternative energy vs drill baby drill conflict, the pro-union vs anti-union fight, the gun control vs 2nd Amendment advocates conflict, the red state vs blue state competition, and on and on. And on. And on. There doesn’t seem to be any end in sight, and to make matters worse, there is very little compromising going on anymore. It’s not about finding common ground anymore. It’s about digging in. It’s about doubling down. It’s about demonizing the other side. And it’s about showing your teeth to anyone on your side that even suggests compromise or working with the other side.

Maybe “divided” no longer describes what is going on in our society. We are diced, cut apart from each other in a million different ways into smaller and smaller segments of the society we claim to be. We might be divided. We might be diced. But the one thing we are definitely not is indivisible.

Advertisements

The tension

There is little about the current state of our federal government that should surprise anyone who studies history.  The two sides in this debate, are not terribly unlike those of earlier debates at the federal level.

John Adams.  Remember him?  He was so freaked out at the prospect of being a 1-term president (gawd, I can just hear Michele Bachmann chanting that) that he put into place the Alien and Sedition Acts.  These acts, much like the gerrymandering that went on in Wisconsin this past year, were designed to keep the people in power, in power.  It made it impossible for people who had just arrived in the United States to vote (can we see your birth certificate, señor?) and it made it illegal to criticize the president.  While we have not made it illegal to criticize the president, we have made it very uncomfortable to criticize “the system.”  If you criticize “the system” by say, participating in the Occupy Movement, you might find yourself pepper sprayed, beaten, and your activities monitored.

In the years to follow, the conservatives of their times found themselves supporting slavery, states rights and nullification.  They felt that Native Americans needed to get out of the way of progress, and that women were better off not being involved in politics (or any other activity that made being barefoot and pregnant more difficult).  In the early 1900’s they hated the trust busting and the conservation movement.  They loved the freewheeling, unregulated stock trading of the 1920’s, and they called FDR a “socialist” (where have we heard THAT recently?).  Conservatives of the 1950’s looked for communists in Congress, not unlike the kind of wild speculation offered recently by Michele Bachmann.  They supported the Vietnam War, no matter how discredited it had become.  They called the protestors against this war “traitors” and UnAmerican,” in much the same way we heard those same criticisms ironically directed at our own president.  They were OK with Watergate and what Nixon hoped to achieve through it.  The redneck band Lynard Skynard sang “Watergate doesn’t bother me, does your conscience bother you?”

Liberals, on the other hand, lined up on the opposite side of these issues.  They voted for Thomas Jefferson and against John Adams.  They worked for the abolition of slavery and for woman suffrage.  They exposed the atrocities perpetrated against Native Americans.  They supported the breaking up of large monopolies and the conservation of our natural resources.  After the Harding-Coolidge-Hoover triumvirate crashed our economy, they elected FDR to bail us out.  They stood up for those who were persecuted during the Communist witch hunts of the 1950’s, and took to the streets to protest the unjust war in Vietnam.  They exposed Nixon and the undermining of the Constitution he and like-minded individuals tried to do.

Today we see those same tensions at play.  The conservatives work tirelessly to protect the privileges of the privileged.  They denounce the middle class as leeches who want entitlements.  They used code words for women and African-Americans.  They cheat at elections by gerrymandering, by making it more difficult for the underclass to vote (think Alien and Sedition Acts), and by running fake Democrats in primaries.  They want to outlaw abortions in all cases, and to make birth control more difficult to obtain.  Some have defended the reproductive rights of rapists.  They oppose gay marriage, vociferously.  They support people to own assault rifles, and bristle at any attempts to control them.  They keep pointing backward to “the good old days.”

Liberals and progressives work tirelessly for worker rights, higher pay, and for a democratic workplace.  They embrace diversity, as evidenced by the rainbow of faces that could be seen in the audience of the Democratic Convention.  They work to expand voting rights, and to make it easier to vote, not harder.  They stand by a woman’s right to choose, and work to make birth control easily available to all who want it so that abortions are not needed.  They embrace their slogan “forward.”

Liberalism has always been the way of the future, and we liberals and progressives have always had to drag the conservatives kicking and screaming, into the future.  So it was yesteryear, and so it is today.